Care & control while impaired means, the driver had the “control” over a motor vehicle while they were impaired.
What is Impaired Driving Care & Control?
The police may have found the accused sitting, stopped in a motor vehicle, or even standing near the vehicle.
Upon speaking to them the officer determined that they had the care or control of the vehicle. The officer formed the opinion that, their ability to drive was impaired due to an alcoholic beverage or drug.
The officer subsequently had the grounds to arrest the driver and demand a breathalyzer test.
Once the officer forms the opinion that:
the driver had the care and control of a motor vehicle, and
their ability to drive was impaired due to the consumption of alcohol or a drug
The police officer may arrest that person for having the care and control of a motor vehicle while impaired.
What is Impaired Driving?
Impaired driving is:
“Having the care or control of a motor vehicle, while the driver’s ability is impaired due to the consumption of an alcohol or drug“
Being impaired doesn’t necessarily mean drunk or intoxicated.
Impaired driving only means that, the driver’s ability to operate a motor vehicle was changed or impaired, due to the consumption of an alcohol or drug.
Sleeping or Not Driving – Not a Defence
Many times people thought that they shouldn’t be driving, and thought they were doing the right thing:
by not driving
trying to “sleep it off”
waiting for the effects of the alcohol to dissipate
while sitting in their vehicle
Criminal courts believe that if someone is sitting in a motor vehicle, they have the care and control of the vehicle. If their ability to drive is impaired by a drug or alcohol, then there is a risk to the public.
Fighting Impaired Driving Care & Control
For the police and the crown attorney impaired driving care & control can be proven by:
use of the vehicle, or
the vehicle was able to be put in motion,
that the driver intended to drive the motor vehicle
the driver had the ability to drive and operate the vehicle
Showing that the accused’s ability was impaired by physical symptoms, e.g. unsteady on feet, slurred speech, strong smell of alcohol with results of a breathalyzer test would be used as evidence.
The accused thought they were doing the right thing by sleeping in the vehicle rather than driving while impaired.
Defending Impaired Driving Care & Control Cases
Everyone is entitled when charged with a criminal offence to defend themselves in court. You may feel that if the police have arrested you for impaired driving that you’re automatically guilty, which is wrong.
For every impaired driving charge there are issues and defences available.
It’s your right under Canadian law to:
have a lawyer challenge the evidence of the police,
to have a Judge hear what happened and
for the judge to make a decision about the guilt or innocence,
not the police.
The law on impaired driving care and control is strict on the accused and police. The police and the crown attorney must do everything properly and legally to obtain a conviction against the accused.
Care & Control Defences
Impaired driving care and control defences can include issues such as:
right to speak with a lawyer in privacy
have the police done everything properly
right to have your trial in a reasonable period of time
collection of evidence against the accused. e.g. breathalyzer tests
have documents been properly submitted and prepared at the court
can the prosecution prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt
insurance rates of over $10,000 per year for 5 years
possible loss of employment
A conviction for impaired driving can cost over fifty thousand (50,000) dollars in increase insurance rates, fees and fines over five (5) years.
Breathalyzer tests must be done properly and legally. If there is a mistake or your rights have been violated, the proper remedy for the judge to do, is to dismiss or “stay” the charges
Collection of Evidence Against the Accused
When the police collect evidence like a breathalyzer test, there are rules that they must follow.
Breathalyzer tests have to be done properly and legally. Where evidence has been “improperly collected” in a criminal matter it may provide a defence for the accused.
If the police are going to use the results of a breathalyzer test to prove an impaired driving care & control charge, the tests have to be:
taken within time limits,
by a qualified breathalyzer technician,
usually within two (2) hours of the time of the offence,
properly served notice on the accused
properly reported to the court.
When the case comes to trial, either the breathalyzer technician has to come to court, or the arresting officer to prove that the breathalyzer readings and notice were properly served on the accused.
When it comes to breathalyzer tests the police have time limits, rules and procedures that must be followed. Where the police have have made errors or improperly conducted a breathalyzer test the charges can be dismissed.
If there is a mistake or your rights have been violated, the proper thing for the judge to do is to dismiss or “stay” your charge.
The Right to Speak to a Lawyer When Arrested
The accused did not received their right to counsel or a lawyer.
if you are charged with a criminal offence then it is your right to speak to a lawyer
the call must be done as soon as possible.
you have the right to speak to the lawyer in privacy without anyone or a police officer being present.
you have the right to speak you a criminal lawyer of your choosing, and
the police must make reasonable steps to put you in contact with that lawyer.
Where your rights as a Canadian citizen have been violated, the proper course of action for the judge hearing your case is to dismiss or stay (withdraw) the charges.
Time Delay Argument
As a Canadian citizen if you are charged with an offence in Canada you have a right to have your case heard by a judge within a reasonable period of time.
The time that is considered reasonable for a criminal matter is about eighteen months (18) months.
If your case takes more than eighteen months (18) months to come to trial as your lawyer I can file a complaint to the judge to have your charge dismissed.
ensure the driver understands what they have been told
ensure that the breathalyzer test is taken as soon as possible
ensure that all evidence is collected properly and legally
ensure that the case is prepared for trial and that all documents are properly prepared
This is partial list of requirements upon the police in arresting and charging the accused; there are many more issues that can arise at trial.
The testimony of the police officer a impaired driving care and control trials can be in issue.
Many times police officers are able to write out the report, but when the case comes to trial months later the officer may have issues regarding what actually happened.
Guilty Beyond a Reasonable Doubt
In a trial for impaired driving, the police have to prove that you are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the police have to prove to the judge that you are 100% guilty of the charge.
In the first instance the accused does not have to defend themselves.
The police have to prove the case against driver, not that driver has to defend themselves.
If the police cannot prove the case against the accused, or the judge has any doubt in their mind, the judge should dismiss the charge.
For example should the judge say that they are 90% sure the accused committed the offence but they have a 10% doubt in their mind, then the judge should dismiss the charge.
Where there is a tie, a tie goes to the accused.
Criminal Trials | Who, What, When, Where & How
In trial for impaired driving, the police and prosecution have to prove these five (5) things:
★★★★★ Nick and his criminal lawyers worked on my impaired driving case. I was worried about getting a criminal record, but they took care of everything.They got my charge dropped to a traffic ticket, not a criminal offence. I’m so happy with the result. Before the trial date, I met with his team at least 8 times total to watch surveillance videos of me, solidify my defence, give me some Information about the law, and do a dry run of the trial with my friend who was going to testify with me. I felt as comfortable as I could given the situation since he prepared me well. Nick seems to has a good report with the court which I believe was to my advantage. He also prepared two back up technical defences. I recommend Charitsis Lawyers highly.
Olena Kuchuryan
7 days ago
★★★★★ My husband was charged with impaired driving and over 80. We felt totally hopeless. We saw a bunch of criminal lawyers for consultation, but only after meeting with Nicholas Charitsis and Vadim Paskaru we saw that they would do whatever it takes to win our case. It was difficult, but Nicholas and Vadim were with us every step of the way, supporting us, explaining next steps, always answering our questions. They always were easy to get in touch with and answer questions. As a result of their work, the impaired driving and over 80 charges were withdrawn. My husband ended up with careless driving ticket, no criminal record. We are very grateful to this amazing team of knowledgeable and skilled criminal lawyers. We would recommend them to anyone who is in trouble and does not know what to do.
Mohammad Niazi
1 week ago
★★★★★ Highly recommend the firm and truly appreciate their hard work, this firm are the best at what they do, they have withdrawn my both charges of Drive over 80 and Impaired Driving. They are a bit pricey but however that’s what it needs for professionals to resolve your matters and they had the courtesy to have me pay it over a period of time so definitely worth it regardless. I recommend them to anyone with any kind of criminal cases specially what I went through as results was awesome. highly recommend 100% no doubt. I’m super happy with their work and results.
Marisol Almarazo
2 weeks ago
★★★★★ I recommend Charitsis Law Criminal Lawyers they won my case! My criminal charges WITHDRAWN and my record will be erased immediately. I recommend them 100% for any legal problem that you need. The results that they provided were very impressive. Thank you
John Stocco
2 weeks ago
★★★★★ I was charged with Care and Control of a Motor Vehicle over 80mg. From the moment I contacted Vadim Paskarou at Charitsis Law, I was put as ease. Vadim was simply outstanding to watch when cross examining the officer who charged me. In the end, I was acquitted thanks to the expertise of Vadim Paskarou at Charitsis Law. If you have been charged with a criminal offence then I would highly recommend contacting Vadim!
Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results and litigation outcomes will vary according to the facts in individual cases.
R. v. Andrews (1996): Alberta Court of Appeal overturns conviction, calls for re-assessment of ‘driving impairment’ evidence in DUI cases.”. More >>>
“R. v. Bernshaw: Exploring the grounds for breathalyzer demands and the debate over test reliability in DUI convictions. More >>>
R. v. Mok: Case focuses on privacy rights violation during DUI arrest, sparking debate on the appropriateness of charges. More >>>
R. v. Roberts: DUI Acquittal: Court dismisses Charter violation claims, focuses on BAC evidence insufficiency and legal counsel rights. More >>>
R. v. Stankewich: Highlighting the acquittal in an impaired driving case despite initial ‘fail’ in roadside breath test. More >>>
R. v. Stark: Not guilty in impaired driving case, emphasizing the critical evaluation of breathalyzer demand grounds. More >>>
R. v. Stellato: Doesn’t need to prove a marked departure from normal conduct to establish impairment. More >>>
R. v. S. (W.D.): Court defines jury instructions on credibility, stressing the importance of reasonable doubt in acquittal decisions. More >>>
This criminal lawyer site is for information only and is not meant to replace qualified legal advice by a criminal lawyer. The application and interpretation of Canadian law, including impaired driving, | DUI and drinking & driving, is constantly changing. The writers shall not be held responsible for any legal information that may be incorrect or out of date. The owners of this criminal defence website recommend that anyone wishing to fight a criminal charge obtain advice from a qualified criminal lawyer before doing so.